Palin is Walking on Thin Ice
Written by: Cole Diamond
On September 6th 2015, Sarah Palin had an interview with CNN where she talked about Obamas visit to Alaska
and about climate change, particularly glaciers. Sarah Palin is the former
governor of Alaska, and was John McCain’s vice president. The interview with
Jake Tapper, a CNN anchor talked with Sarah about climate change. Sarah Palin
brought up glaciers and how Obama only referenced one glacier that was
shrinking but didn’t acknowledge any of the growing glaciers. She talked about
the cyclical cycle and how she doesn’t think the changes in the weather have
anything to do with man. In the interview Sarah Palin said:
“I take changes in the weather; the cyclical changes that the
globe has undergone for – since the beginning of time, I take it seriously, but
I’m not going to blame these changes in the weather on man’s footprint. Obama
was up here looking at, say, the glaciers and pointing out a glacier that was
receding. Well, there are other glaciers, though, that are growing up here. And
he didn’t highlight that, but he used glaciers as an example.”
With Sarah Palin’s claim in mind we will look
over a couple of her main points that she mentioned in her interview. Sarah
said she takes the cyclical changes seriously so we will go over what a
cyclical cycle is and if it supports what she is trying to say. Sarah doesn’t think
“man’s footprint” has anything to do with changing weather but scientific data
has something to say about “man’s footprint.” Let’s also take a look at
glaciers, is that one glacier that Obama pointed at the only glacier that is
receding? According to Sarah it is.
Sarah said in her interview that she takes the
cyclical changes seriously. What is the cyclical cycle? In this setting Sarah
may be talking about the Milankovitch Cycle. The Milankovitch cycle is a cycle that a
mathematician and astrophysicist has created whose name is Milutin
Milankovitch. It is a mathematical theory for climate. It explains how the
earth’s orbit and its rotation on its axis has been triggering ice ages and warmer
weather. It is believed that as the Earth’s orbit changes, the amount of
sunlight that hits certain areas of the earth or certain latitudes determine
whether or not the earth is in an ice age or a warm period. More sun in the
northern latitudes mean warmer earth temperatures. When the sun is not as
strong in the northern latitudes the earth is in an ice age. There are three
main important forces that will cause the earth to go through these different
cycles. Eccentricity, obliquity, and precession are the different cycles. The eccentricity
cycle happens about every 100,000 years and this deals with the earth’s orbit
around the sun. It basically means the earth spends less time around the sun at
certain parts of the year. The farther from the sun the less heat the earth
gets and the colder the planet is. The obliquity cycle happens about every
41,000 years and this is the earth’s tilt on its orbital plane. If the earth
has the northern half pointed more at the sun, then more ice melts on the
northern half of the planet. On the opposite side, the earth will cool if the
tilt is going the other way. The precession cycle occurs every 26,000 years and
this is a tidal driven cycle, the moon and the sun influence it. The pole that
is closer to the sun will have a warm summer and a cold winter while the
opposite pole will have a cold summer and a warm winter.
Milankovitch Cycle Image by Hannes Grobe |
Within Sarah’s quote she says that she doesn’t
blame changes in the weather on “man’s footprint,” we all know what greenhouse gasses are and where they come from. Manmade greenhouse gasses are
absorbing the heat from the sun and holding it in the earth’s atmosphere
warming the planet. With this going on the weather is going to change and is already changing. Higher temperatures mean worsening
disasters, warmer weather holds in rain which means dry areas get drier and wet
areas get more wet. Dryer areas mean more droughts and fires that can become
disastrous and the wet areas will flood more. The more disasters there are the
more they will cost. From manmade machines there are more emissions that can
directly affect the climate but in a way that is surprising, emissions can
directly attack the oceans. The oceans are becoming more acidic which
means the animals that have shells like crabs, lobsters or any sea creature
with calcium carbonate shells are at risk. The acidic level of the oceans can
eat away the shells and leave the shellfish vulnerable. Corals are at risk of
this also, without corals the oceans will lose their brilliance and the other
organisms that rely on the corals for food or homes will suffer also.
The Muir and Riggs Glacier showing the impact of climate change. Images taken by Natasha. |
Glaciers are an important part for research of
climates from the past. Taking ice cores from glaciers and ice caps gives researchers an idea of what the
atmosphere was like and the climate from thousands of years ago. In Sarah
Palin’s interview she mentions that there are “glaciers growing up here”
referring to glaciers growing in Alaska. In a study from the University of
Alaska in Fairbanks and other institutions they showed that Alaska has lost
over 75 gigatons of ice every year from 1994 to 2003. A gigaton is a
billion metric tons. As the ice melts the water levels rise. In Alaska 98% of the glaciers have thinned and are receding. In other countries
across the world including North Asia, Northwest Canada, Russia, it is projected that they will lose up to 80% of their glaciers by the year 2100.
Looking back at Sarah Palin’s interview quote
about climate change we know from scientific data that man’s footprint is
having a big impact on the earth’s greenhouse gasses and the weather. The
Milankovitch cycle that Sarah may have been meaning when she said the cyclical
cycle may be the best evidence of global warming and cooling. It is up to the
readers to determine if the Milankovitch cycle theory is a determining factor
of global warming and cooling. It is hard to not see that a giant piece of ice
(a glacier) is shrinking and disappearing. Somebody should show Sarah Palin
that 98% of the ice in Alaska is receding and melting. Is the Milankovitch
cycle causing the earth to heat up? Is the earth heating up because of “man’s
footprint?” Is climate change and global warming a combination of the two?
No comments:
Post a Comment